International Residents' Perspectives on Education and Challenges in Microsurgery Training

Objective Microsurgery remains an integral component of the surgical skillset and is essential for a diversity of reconstructive procedures. The apprenticeship also requires overcoming a steep learning curve, among many challenges. The method of microsurgical training differs depending on the countries' regions and resources of their health care system. Methods The Journal of Hand and Microsurgery leadership held an international webinar on June 19, 2021, consisting of a panel of residents from 10 countries and moderated by eminent panelists. This inaugural event aimed to share different experiences of microsurgery training on a global scale, identifying challenges to accessing and delivering training. Results Residents shared various structures and modes of microsurgical education worldwide. Areas of discussion also included microsurgical laboratory training, simulation training, knowledge sharing, burnout among trainees, and challenges for female residents in microsurgical training. Conclusion Microsurgical proficiency is attained through deliberate and continued practice, and there is a strong emphasis globally on training and guidance. However, much remains to be done to improve microsurgical training and start acting on the various challenges raised by residents.Copyright © 2022. Society of Indian Hand & Microsurgeons. All rights reserved.

Hand Surgical Simulation in the Pandemic Era: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and duty hour restrictions have illuminated a role for surgical simulation in trainees that permits meaningful technical experience outside the operating room. There is a need for the implementation of surgical simulation infrastructure adjacent to clinical training with practical considerations for complexity and cost. This systematic review analyzes surgical simulations that train hand surgical techniques and procedures with subjective or objective competency assessment. Method(s): A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA- P guidelines using the PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Selected search terms included procedures relevant to the field of hand surgery and various types of simulation training. Data, including skills and techniques taught and assessed, model type, equipment, cost, and emphasis placed in training for each article, were extracted. Result(s): Of 2,519 articles, 40 met inclusion criteria. Models were described as: synthetic benchtop/3D-printed (40.0%), animal (22.5%), cadaveric (20.0%), augmented and virtual reality (AR/ VR;12.5%), and other computer simulation (12.5%). Three models incorporated both a physical benchtop component and an AR/ VR component. The procedures most represented included tendon repair (30.0%), fracture fixation (27.5%), wrist arthroscopy (15.0%), and carpal tunnel release (15.0%). Sixty-five percent of articles emphasized the importance of surgical simulation in a surgeon's training. Conclusion(s): A diversity of surgical simulation models exist for the practice of various aspects of hand surgery. The existing literature demonstrates their utility for increasing expertise with surgical techniques and procedures in a low-risk setting.

Hand Surgery in New Zealand.

Hand surgery in New Zealand has steadily grown from its origins in plastic surgery and orthopaedic surgery into its own discipline. There has been much progress and innovation in hand surgery that has originated from New Zealand and this review acknowledges the historical figures and events that have led to our present position. The current and future directions of hand surgery in our country are also discussed. As a small and remote country, we are very fortunate to have close relationships with other international hand societies. Through these relationships and the efforts of committed regional hand surgeons, the art and science of hand surgery in New Zealand continues to progress.

Evaluation of the COVID-19 Infection Rate in the Perioperative Period of Elective Surgeries of the Hand and Microsurgery.

BACKGROUND: After the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]), the world started reducing the number of elective surgeries to reduce the transmission of the coronavirus. Some priority elective surgeries were performed, and there was no increase in contagion rates due to safety protocols and protection measures. The study aims to present the coronavirus infection rate of elective hand surgeries and microsurgery performed during pandemics. METHODS: A retrospective study evaluating 188 patients submitted to elective surgical procedures. The exclusion criteria were patients infected by COVID-19 before the surgery and patients who submitted to trauma surgery. Only 108 patients were eligible for this study. The mean age was 47.8 years (range: 15 days-81 years). There were 63 females and 45 males. They were divided into 2 groups: outpatient (n = 49) and inpatient (n = 59) procedures. RESULTS: The overall COVID infection rate was 6.48%. The outpatient infection rate was 2.08%, whereas the inpatient infection rate was 10.17% (Student t test: P = .089). The main factor correlated with infection in the postoperative period was the number of postoperative outpatient visits (Student t test: P = .089). No statistical differences were observed between the variables studied, but there was a tendency for patients who submitted to inpatient surgery to get infected by COVID-19 (P = .089). The statistical power was 0.8 (Cohen's d test), showing that large samples are needed to analyze the correlation better. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the safety of performing elective hand surgery during the pandemic remains unclear, and more studies with larger samples are needed.

Comparison of Patient Perception and Satisfaction of Face-to-Face Versus Telemedicine Encounters in Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) surge has enabled the widespread usage of telemedicine (TM) and presents a unique opportunity to determine the hand surgery patients' perception of care using validated patient satisfaction scores. METHODS: Electronic surveys were distributed to patients aged 18 years and older who underwent a video TM encounter with a single surgeon at an academic medical center during the initial COVID-19 surge (March 23 to October 22, 2020). The study-specific questions were derived from the Press Ganey (PG) Medical Practice TM Survey and compared with institutional PG Outpatient Medical Practice Survey data. Three cohorts were defined: pre-COVID face-to-face, post-COVID TM, and post-COVID face-to-face. RESULTS: Thirty of 65 TM patients (46.2%) responded. No differences in sex, age, or visit type were identified between cohorts. The TM cohort was more likely to live greater than 300 miles from the institution. Median response for all cohorts for the PG care provider and overall experience responses were "very good," and no differences were identified between cohorts. Patient satisfaction with their TM experience was high with median satisfaction scores for arranging and connecting to a TM visit, talking with the provider over a video connection, and having the provider understand the clinical problem were "very good." Patients in the TM cohort reported no difference in preference for face-to-face or TM visits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are satisfied with TM as a substitute for face-to-face visits suggesting that TM can possibly be used to deliver comparable patient experience for hand surgery encounters.

A Template for Video Telehealth Hand and Wrist Consultations during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Preliminary Analysis of Patient and Provider Reported Outcomes

Purpose of Study: COVID-19 introduced a rapid shift to video telehealth patient visits. At our institution in Loma Linda, California, less than 13% of hand surgery patients were seen in person at the height of the pandemic, with the majority of patients being triaged to video telehealth appointments. This was challenging for the hand surgeon due to the complexity of a hand patient's physical examination. During this time, it was critical to rapidly develop, test, and implement a tool to assist the surgeon in evaluating and triaging patients effectively over video. The purpose of this project was to develop and implement a tool that would improve the effectiveness and efficiency of video telehealth visits for hand and wrist patients. Methods Used: We developed an informational packet that was sent to patients prior to their video telehealth visit containing a letter of explanation, a new patient questionnaire, and a step-by-step guide with photos for a virtual hand examination. The letter explained the guide's purpose and provided additional instructions to ensure visit effectiveness- remove jewelry and watches, find a space with optimal lighting, wear a short sleeve shirt, etc. In the virtual hand examination guide, we explained common physical examination maneuvers and The Ten Test to assist with virtual sensation assessment. A short "how-to" description in lay terms was given for each of the physical examination maneuvers and included corresponding photographs to maximize patient comprehension. Patients were instructed to read the guide prior to their video visit and to have it available during the visit. Summary of Results: We began to implement this tool in our hand practice for new and established patients in March 2020, and we have since found that our virtual hand examination has become more thorough and efficient. Surgeon satisfaction with this tool has been high, and patients have reported satisfaction and comfort. Patients have felt that it increased their understanding of the virtual physical examination process, decreased frustration, and have stated that they would recommend this guide to other patients scheduled to undergo a video telehealth visit. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid shift from in-person visits to video telehealth consultations. This subsequently changed the way in which hand surgeons could evaluate their patients. The procedural changes that were adopted during the pandemic can be viewed as a sign of things to come, and we anticipate that video telehealth visits will continue to be commonplace in the future. In the wake of this change, we feel confident that this tool equips the hand surgeon well for an effective and efficient virtual examination and ultimately contributes to patient satisfaction.

Patient Perspectives on Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Patients received care over telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, and their perspective is useful for hand surgeons. METHODS: Online surveys were sent October-November 2020 to 497 patients who received telemedicine care. Questions were free-response and multi-item Likert scales asking about telehealth in general, limitations, benefits, comparisons to in-person visits, and opinions on future use. RESULTS: The response rate was 26% (n = 130). Prior to the pandemic, 55% had not used telemedicine for hand surgery consultation. Patients liked their telemedicine visit and felt their provider spent enough time with them (means = 9/10). In all, 48% would have preferred in-person visits despite the pandemic, and 69% would prefer in-person visits once the pandemic concludes. While 43% had no concerns with telemedicine, 36% had difficulties explaining their symptoms. Telemedicine was easy to access and navigate (M = 9/10). However, 23% saw telemedicine of limited value due to the need for an in-person visit soon afterward. Of these patients, 46% needed an in-person visit due to inadequate physical examination. Factors that make telemedicine more favorable to patients included convenience, lack of travel, scheduling ease, and time saved. Factors making telemedicine less favorable included need for in-person examination or procedure, pain assessment, and poor connectivity. There was no specific appointment time the cohort preferred. Patient recommendations to improve telemedicine included decreasing wait times and showing patient queue, wait time, or physician status online. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine was strongly liked by patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, nearly 70% of patients still preferred in-person visits for the future.

Walant-Efficient and Safe Technique-Key Treatment in Covid-19 Pandemic

Aim of the study The aim of the study was to confirm the effectiveness and safety of wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in hand surgery, as well as its necessity and importance during the COVID-19 pandemics. Material and methods A retrospective study was performed between March 2020 and September 2021 to evaluate advantages of WALANT, taking into consideration the rules imposed by the pandemic context. This study included 360 patients, treated for acute and chronic hand diseases. A statistical investigation was performed using SPSS 20.0 version software and applying the ANOVA regression, evaluating demographic, anatomical and surgical variables. Results: 234 males and 126 females, treated for acute hand trauma (metacarpal and phalanx fractures, tendon and nerves lesions) and chronic hand diseases such as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) dupuytren's disease (DD), trigger finger (TF), soft tissue and bone tumors. The average patient waiting time from admission in the operating room was 13.95 minutes, while the mean time of onset of local anesthesia was 12.15 minutes. No complications such as distal digital bleeding, hematoma, the necessity of using the antidote, or necrosis occurred, the outcomes were very good and the patient satisfaction high. Conclusions: The WALANT technique can be considered the "gold standard" in hand surgery anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic, ensuring a correct and safe surgical treatment in the restrictive conditions imposed by the epidemiological context.

Orthopaedic Hand Surgical Simulation Training: A Review

In recent years, new orthopaedic surgical simulation and virtual reality (VR) training models have emerged to provide unlimited education medium to an unlimited number of trainees with no time limit, especially in response to trainee work-hour restrictions. Surgical simulators range from simple wooden boxes to animal and cadaver models to three-dimensional-printed and VR simulators. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic further highlighted the need for at-home learning tools for orthopaedic surgical trainees. Advancement in simulating shoulder and knee arthroscopies using VR simulators surpasses the other fields in orthopaedic surgery. Despite the high degree of precision needed to operate at a microscopic level involving vessels, nerves, and the small bones of the hand, the simulation tools have limited advancement in the field of orthopaedic hand surgery. This narrative review summarizes the status of surgical simulation and training techniques available to orthopaedic hand surgical trainees, factors affecting their application, and areas in hand surgery that still lag behind their surgical subspecialty counterparts.

Pulmonary Complications and Mortality in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Undergoing Elective and Emergent Hand Surgery

Background Patients acutely infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may have increased risk for postsurgical pulmonary complications and mortality, particularly with general anesthesia. Surgery is often delayed to mitigate risk;however, excessive delays may result in morbidity. Optimal criteria for delaying surgery in patients with or without symptoms are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate any complications following hand surgery in patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with a positive polymerase chain reaction test within 60 days before or after hand surgery between March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Patients were telephoned also to supplement records. Type of surgery, type of anesthesia, comorbidities, timing of surgery, onset of symptoms, and complications were recorded.Results We identified 21 patients undergoing 26 procedures, of which 21 (81%) were emergency procedures and 5 (19%) were elective. Mean age was 37 years (range: 17-71). General anesthesia was used in 88% of cases, with mean duration of 110 minutes. SARS-CoV-2 was diagnosed on average 6 days preoperatively (range: 39 days preop-14 days postop). Positive tests were usually identified preoperatively (50%), versus day-of-surgery (25%) or postoperatively (25%). Patients were symptomatic in only 27% of cases, and completely asymptomatic in 73%. No asymptomatic patients developed complications. One patient suffered a fracture malunion after delayed surgery. Pulmonary complications were noted in 3 patients;all had prior pulmonary disease and underwent emergency surgeries under general anesthesia. Overall mortality rate was 0%.Conclusion Pulmonary complications and mortality are low following hand surgery in asymptomatic patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.

Hand Trauma Virtual Clinics Prove Effective During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Due to the devastating and far-reaching impact of the novel COVID-19 pandemic, hospital resources have been redirected to protect patients and health care staff, thereby vastly reducing the capacity for outpatient follow-up within a busy Plastic Surgery and Hand Trauma center. Through the use of telephone and video technology, virtual clinics were rapidly introduced to reduce hospital footfall. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patient experiences in virtual and traditional face-to-face clinics through the month of April 2020, from the second week of the government-imposed lockdown. A 5-point Visit-Specific Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to subsequently collect patients' feedback regarding their appointments. RESULTS: A total of 107 hand injury-related follow-up appointments were recorded during the 4-week period. Sixty (56.0%) appointments were performed as a virtual consultation, and 47 (43.9%) face-to-face consultations were carried out on site. It was possible to discharge 43.3% from the virtual clinic group and 57.4% from the face-to-face group. We identified no significant difference in patient satisfaction (P = .368, Mann-Whitney U test) between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSION: Virtual clinics appear to be safe and effective for the follow-up of patients with traumatic hand injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. This approach may prove beneficial in terms of workforce organization, reducing waiting times, and providing an alternative for patients unable to attend physical appointments.

Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Hand Surgery Perspective.

Background: A major consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. healthcare system has been the rapid transition away from in-person healthcare visits to telehealth. This study analyzed patient and surgeon satisfaction in the utilization of telehealth within the hand surgery division during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: All hand surgery patients who completed a telemedicine visit from March 30th, 2020 through April 30th, 2020 completed a 14-question survey via e-mail. Hand surgeons who participated in telemedicine completed a separate 14-question survey. Survey results were presented descriptively (mean ± standard deviation) and patient factors influencing satisfaction were determined using univariate and multivariate proportional modeling. Results: 89 patients and five surgeons completed the surveys. Patients were very satisfied with their telemedicine visits (4.21/5.00 ± 0.89). Multivariate proportional modeling determined patients who found it "very easy" (5/5) to arrange telemedicine visits had greater satisfaction (OR = 4.928; 95% CI = 0.94 to 25.84) compared to those who found it "difficult" (2/5) (p = 0.059). Patients who believed they could ask/relay questions/concerns "extremely effectively" (5/5) had greater satisfaction (OR = 55.236; CI = 11.39 to 267.80) compared to those who asked/relayed questions only "slightly effective" to "moderately effectively" (p < 0.001). Surgeons were similarly satisfied with their telemedicine experience (4.00/5.00 ± 0.89) and were confident in their diagnoses (4.20/5.00 ± 0.84). All surgeons responded they will continue using telemedicine. 30.7% of patients would choose telemedicine over an inperson visit. Conclusions: Telemedicine provides a viable platform for healthcare delivery with high patient and surgeon satisfaction. Most patients still prefer in-person visits for the post-pandemic future.

Learner Preferences and Perceptions of Virtual Hand Surgery Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many postgraduate medical education lectures and conferences have been moved to a virtual platform. Questions remain regarding the effectiveness of virtual education, what types of educational offerings can be transitioned to a virtual format, and what types of curricula should still take place in person. METHODS: This study surveyed trainees from the United States who participated in a single institution's hand surgery virtual flipped classroom curriculum of 6 week-long modules. Demographics, premodule and postmodule achieved levels of learning based on Bloom's taxonomy, technology usage, and preferences were surveyed. RESULTS: Of the 65 participants, 41 (63.1%) responded to the survey. Trainees included hand surgery fellows (27/41 [65.9%]), orthopedic surgery residents (11/41[26.8%]), and plastic surgery residents (3/41 [7.3%]). On average, most trainees read, viewed, and participated in more than half of the articles (28/41 [68.3%]), electronic videos (31/41 [75.6%]), and conferences (35/41 [85.4%]) per week. The median level of achieved learning increased from "I can apply" to "I can analyze" for all modules. Self-directed learning was preferred for basic facts and knowledge (26/41 [63.4%]) and faculty-directed learning was preferred to review and practice advanced concepts (34/41 [82.9%]). The participants perceived benefits of the virtual curriculum to include increased scheduling flexibility (8/41[19.5%]), expert opinions (7/41 [17.1%]), and diversity of educational formats (3/41 [7.3%]). The perceived drawbacks included decreased interaction (8/41 [19.5%]), technical difficulties (6/41 [14.6%]), excessive detail (3/41 [7.3%]), and single-institution bias (2/41 [4.9%]). CONCLUSIONS: The flipped virtual classroom model is an effective and preferred method of instruction for trainees. Trainees achieved a higher level of learning following the completion of each week-long module. Considerations for the implementation of a virtual curriculum include content quality, quantity, and reducing single-institution bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The implementation of virtual learning can enhance hand surgery education for the modern learner.

Changes in organization of activity of hand surgery department during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many medical specialties throughout the world, including hand surgery. Emergency hand surgery deals with a wide spectrum of injuries, including bone fractures, nerve, tendon and vessel cuts, complex injuries and amputations. These traumas occur independently to the phase of the pandemic. The objective of this study was presentation of changes in organization of activity of hand surgery department during the COVID-19 pandemic. Modifications of the activity were described in details. Over a period of the pandemic (from April 2020 to March 2022), a total of 4150 patients were treated, in this number 2327 (56%) with acute injuries and 1823 (44%) with common hand diseases. Forty-one (1%) patients were diagnosed COVID-19 positive, 19 (46%) with hand injuries and 32 (54%) with hand disorders. One case of work-related COVID-19 infection was registered in the 6-people clinic team in analysed period. Results of this study show effectiveness of measures undertaken in the authors institution to prevent the coronavirus infection and viral transmission in hand surgery staff.

Isolated Compartment Syndrome of the Hand After Intravenous Doxycycline Infiltration Injury.

Isolated compartment syndrome of the hand, although uncommon, can lead to considerable functional deficits if not treated promptly. The most common etiologies are related to trauma, burns, or electric injuries; however, some cases have been reported after intravenous infiltration events, particularly rapid intravenous contrast injection. In this case report, we describe the development of compartment syndrome in the hand of a critically ill patient with COVID-19 pneumonia and sepsis 16 days after doxycycline infiltration injury. She presented with worsening pain, swelling, bullous eruption, and intrinsic minus hand posturing. Emergent surgical release of intrinsic hand compartments and evacuation of a hematoma resolved her symptoms and preserved hand function. Early recognition and surgical intervention of compartment syndrome of the hand after infiltration injury in medically complex patients will reduce morbidity in this patient population.

Quantifying the Impact of COVID-19 on Hand and Wrist Surgery Procedural Volume: A National Analysis of 381,046 Cases.

Purpose: To quantify and describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on procedural volume trends in hand and wrist surgery from 2020 to early 2022 at multiple centers. Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, a real-time, national, federated research database was used to identify patients of interest from 56 health care organizations across the United States. Patients were queried from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2022. Current Procedural Terminology codes were chosen using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's hand fellowship procedure requirements. Results: Common hand and wrist surgeries exhibited substantial fluctuations in procedural volume per health care organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Time periods with considerable procedural volume decreases corresponded with surges in increased COVID-19 caseloads and emergence of COVID-19 variants. Periods of procedural volume increase occurred in the summer of 2020 and immediately following distribution of the COVID-19 vaccine to the public. Fixation of metacarpal fracture, fixation of phalangeal fracture, tendon transfer, flexor tendon repair, and extensor tendon repair consistently showed decreased volumes over the study period. In contrast, ulnar nerve decompression was the only procedure to experience a statistically significant increase in volume over an entire year (2021, +19.2%, P < .001), as compared to before the pandemic. Conclusions: Major milestones of the COVID-19 pandemic correlated with fluctuations in the number of hand and wrist procedures performed across the United States. Future studies should seek to evaluate the impact of patient backlogs and individual procedure fluctuations on financial impacts, patient outcomes, and orthopedic trainee experience. Type of study/level of evidence: Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

The impact of COVID-19 on hand surgery: A French retrospective comparative study in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 hand trauma centers.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the pandemic divided France into two zones: COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The main objective of our study was to compare the variability of surgical and emergency consultation activity amongst two hand trauma centers, between the pandemic period and outside the pandemic period. The secondary objective was to identify at-risk patients in order to develop preventative strategies in hand trauma. METHODS: This bi-centric retrospective study considered the epidemiology of admissions to trauma centers during the first French lockdown. The data were compared to the same period in 2019 (control group). Two thousand and fifty-five patients underwent consultations for hand or wrist trauma. RESULTS: The first French lockdown was associated with a 35% decrease in hand and wrist injuries in the COVID-19 zone versus 24% in the non-COVID-19 zone, compared to the same period in 2019 (p<0.0001, 95% CI: 6.5-15.6). Comparing 2019 and 2020, the incidence of wounds significantly increased in the COVID-19 zone (58% vs. 78%, p<0.0001) and significantly decreased in the non-COVID-19 zone (55% vs. 50%, p<0.0001). Complex wounds (16% vs. 35%, p<0.0001 and 15% vs. 17%, p<0.0001) and open fractures (8% vs. 14%, p=0.019 and 4.5% vs. 5.3%, p<0.0001) significantly increased in both zones during the pandemic. The rate of male, non-manual workers injured in domestic accidents (76% vs. 36%, p<0.0001) was significantly increased in all areas. CONCLUSION: Hand and wrist trauma was less frequent but more severe during the pandemic compared to the same period in 2019. By encouraging the public to be aware of the risks and the means to avoid trauma, such as better information and compliance with safety instructions, we could minimize these risks. This data can be useful in planning preventative strategies for future lockdowns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; case-control study.

Waste Mitigation: A Marriage of Cost Savings and Sustainability

Waste in medicine can be defined narrowly by including only physical waste. It can be defined widely by including the concept of wasting time, energy, money and waste of materials. We will provide an overview of waste mitigation and how it can be a union between saving money and protecting the environment. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Analysis of severe hand trauma injury frequency during "Munich's Oktoberfest" within the last 9 years in comparison to years with absence due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Within its 2 week period, the Oktoberfest attracts around 6 million visitors yearly to Munich, Germany. Due to alcohol intake, congested halls, and disorderly activities, numerous accidents occur. Although many hand injuries are observed, the impact of Oktoberfest on severe hand trauma injury frequency is under investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the regional emergency medical service (EMS) was analyzed over a 9 year period regarding the frequency of severe hand injuries during the world's largest fair and compared to the corresponding period in the years 2020 and 2021 where the event was cancelled due to the world-wide COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we compared the patient numbers during the same period in one Emergency Department of a level-1-trauma and hand trauma center located close to the venue. RESULTS: An exploratory description is made from data collected over a 9 year period (2013-2021) with focus on hand injuries before, during and after the "Oktoberfest". A total of 4017 hand injuries were allocated to hospitals by EMS. There was an increase in severe hand injuries by 66% during the 2-weeks-Oktoberfest-period compared to years where the Oktoberfest did not take place. Pre-pandemic statistics show an increasing severe hand trauma frequency of 57.5% in September, compared to EMS-referrals during the remanding year. CONCLUSION: The risk of injuring relevant structures of the hand during Oktoberfest is extremely high as compared to other parts of the body due to beer stein and fall-associated injuries. These injuries can lead to lifelong impairments. Our data are the first that quantifies and pinpoints the risk of severe injury to the hand during Oktoberfest and therefore, it is of great interest for visitors, hand surgeons, paramedics and emergency department healthcare workers.